<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why are the Disks of Stars Not Seen in Telescopic Views?</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/</link> <description>Space, Art, Blown Glass, Contraptions, Programming... You Name it !</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Flemme gigantesque de 700 000 km proportionnellement c'est quoi?</title><link>http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link> <dc:creator>Flemme gigantesque de 700 000 km proportionnellement c'est quoi?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:01:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imperialearth.com/?p=570#comment-648</guid> <description>[...] : nasa.gov,  blog.imperialearth.com, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : nasa.gov,  blog.imperialearth.com, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.E. Johnson</title><link>http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link> <dc:creator>B.E. Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:21:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imperialearth.com/?p=570#comment-444</guid> <description>Heh. Thanks for the comment I&#039;m very familiar with interferometry, both optical and radio. Do you expect that the student who asked the question would really get what we&#039;re discussing, here? I answered such that they could learn the basics and perhaps develop a desire to learn more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Thanks for the comment I'm very familiar with interferometry, both optical and radio. Do you expect that the student who asked the question would really get what we're discussing, here? I answered such that they could learn the basics and perhaps develop a desire to learn more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick Shaffer</title><link>http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link> <dc:creator>Rick Shaffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:21:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imperialearth.com/?p=570#comment-434</guid> <description>I&#039;m not interested in being your enemy, BJ, but I gotta say that your answer to the question about why we can&#039;t see the disks of stars isn&#039;t complete.  Yes, the stars are very far away compared to their great distances.  However, an optical phenomenon known as diffraction limits how well any telescope of a certain size can resolve tiny objects.  It doesn&#039;t matter how big the image is made, diffraction limits the fine detail we can see.  The only ways to increase the resolution is to simply make a bigger telescope or to make an array of telescopes and combine their images in a special way to increase the resolution.  That technique is called optical interferometry.  Lowell Observatory and the US Navy are working that.  Here&#039;s the WikiPedia URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_interferometer
You might want to check into that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not interested in being your enemy, BJ, but I gotta say that your answer to the question about why we can't see the disks of stars isn't complete.  Yes, the stars are very far away compared to their great distances.  However, an optical phenomenon known as diffraction limits how well any telescope of a certain size can resolve tiny objects.  It doesn't matter how big the image is made, diffraction limits the fine detail we can see.  The only ways to increase the resolution is to simply make a bigger telescope or to make an array of telescopes and combine their images in a special way to increase the resolution.  That technique is called optical interferometry.  Lowell Observatory and the US Navy are working that.  Here's the WikiPedia URL:</p><p><a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_interferometer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_interferometer</a></p><p>You might want to check into that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Watch Across The Universe Online</title><link>http://blog.imperialearth.com/science/astronomy/why-star-disks-not-seen-telescopes/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link> <dc:creator>Watch Across The Universe Online</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:49:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.imperialearth.com/?p=570#comment-396</guid> <description>Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
